http://williamwestfall.posterous.com/

David Beamer, father of Todd Beamer (famous American who shouted “Let’s roll!” on United Airlines flight 93) speaks out against Islam and the proposed mosque to be erected on Ground-Zero.  What do you think?  Is he right?  Should America take an aggressive stance against Muslims?  If so, why?  If not, why?  Is this the only path Christians can walk, or are there other options?  Is this a political issue, or is it something that is better dealt with on another front?

What about Americans who choose to be Muslim?  Are they still Americans?  Beamer seems to think this is not possible…yet America is a country of religious freedom.

Where IS this country headed?  How do YOU see the future?

http://www.youtube.com/v/Bl6PIb8DuZw&hl=en&fs=1

Sometimes the edge on which we stand can offer the best view.

Over the next three years, I’m spending significant time taking in the view from where I stand…I’ll be developing some resources for campus ministers.

As a part of Impact Campus Ministries [The organization I help to lead, ICM is a campus ministry planting organization.  We define success in terms of developing intimacy with God.  We’re committed to pursuing, modeling, and teaching intimacy with God on the college campus, and we’re convinced that campus ministry will be most successful when done using missional (contextually sensitive and God-driven) methods.], my task over these next three years is to develop (and begin to implement) a missional approach to campus ministry.  The college campus is a unique cultural context, and effective ministry to students will heavily utilize missiological methods.  Campus ministry IS “missions”!

As I move through this process, I’ll need your help.   I’ll often present new ideas, ask questions, and vocalize concerns.  Please recognize that I’m on a journey, just like all of you.  I’m in the process of being perfected, and will make plenty of mistakes along the way.  Mistakes don’t scare me though…I’m willing to venture out, and to learn from my mis-steps.

You can join me on the journey.  All of my research will be made public.  Visit the DMinGML website for details, and follow along here, on my blog.

I’m excited to see what God will do in campus ministry over the coming decade.  I firmly believe the college campus is the next great mission field that the Church will engage (once she more fully recognizes that “missions” begins at the end of her nose).  It’s thrilling to consider!

At present, here are some of the main topics I’ll be pursuing over these first few months:

• The historical context of campus ministry
• The possibilities for “Campus Culture-Mapping” (inductive research into the heart of a given college campus)
• The essential nature of working in community, as the people of God
• The foundational understanding of God’s mission to the world, and how that relates to the university context

May God be glorified in our discoveries!  And please remember, “missions” is all about going to the earth’s edge…starting with the one on which you’re standing!

Networking with other campus ministers (working in community) is an essential part of my three year project to research and develop a contextualized approach to campus ministry.  The Casual Catalyst Conference College Ministers Cohort will be an excellent place to start.

http://exploringcollegeministry.com/2010/04/28/casual-catalyst-conference-college-ministers-cohort/

Favre, thanks for demonstrating how an individualistic and selfish approach to pre-season impacts the team. Nice 0-2 start.

Interesting to ponder.

As a part of the doctorate program I have recently entered into (George Fox’s Global, Missional, Leadership Doctor of Ministry), I’ll be writing a series of reflections on my reading.  Your interaction with my reflections will be a tremendous help to me as I try to apply to my specific ministry context (campus ministry) the ideas I am hearing.

To begin, today I will be taking a look at To Change the World, by James Davidson Hunter.

But before I address Hunter, I’d like to direct you to the blogs of my fellow students.  They will also be posting reviews and comments on these readings, and we will, together, be engaging in dialogue as a learning community.  Follow this link to www.dmingml.com to find access to the larger discussion taking place.

Now, on to Hunter…

Because To Change the World is divided up into three essays, I will dedicate three separate entries to his work, one entry for each essay, as well as a fourth entry to develop some practical applications for the campus ministry context.

The main question Hunter is asking, and addressing, is a simple one:  …how do believers live out their faith under the conditions of the late modern world? (p. ix)

Now, this question is not particularly new.  Throughout the centuries the Church has asked, and struggled with, the question of how to live in the world but not to be of the world (1 John 2), in their particular and peculiar contexts.  However, as Hunter will show, the complexities of our world have never been greater than they are today.  And in the midst those complexities, the Church is struggling to find unity in her response (for an insightful discussion on the division of the traditional church with the “Emergent” movement, for example, I recommend Belcher’s, Deep Church).  Thus, the question is a critical one for believers today.

In his first essay, Hunter works slowly, deliberately, and convincingly to critique current models of cultural transformation.  This is indeed an excellent place to begin formulating his response.  After all, as Hunter points out,

To be Christian is to be obliged to engage the world, pursuing God’s restorative purposes over all of life, individual and corporate, public and private (p. 4, emphasis mine).

And in engaging the world, Christians are ultimately hoping to transform the hearts and minds of people, and along with this to transform the culture, in such a way that reflects the goodness of God.  Hunter’s contention is that the dominant ways of thinking about culture and cultural change are flawed, for they are based on both specious social science and problematic theology (p. 5).

Through the use of both contemporary and historical examples, Hunter exposes the weaknesses of dominant views of cultural transformation.  In his opinion, culture is not changed from the bottom-up, or by individuals, or by purposeful planning (all elements of the “common view” that Hunter describes).  These methods, today largely pursued through the political system, simply have not proven to be effective in bringing about changes in society.  Rather, Hunter’s assertion is that cultural transformation is the result of top-down influences, initiated by society’s “elites” (those in positions of significant power), who are part of strong networks of overlapping interest groups, providing tangible expressions of their ideas.

In essence, Hunter believes that change does NOT come about through the impact of the transformed heart and mind of the individual, but through a complex array of factors, of which the individual is a very small part.  Indeed, he states that:

…it is not so much individual hearts and minds that move cultures but cultures that ultimately shape the hearts and minds, and, thus, direct the lives of individuals.  The movement between the individual and culture goes in both directions and perhaps moves even more strongly in the latter direction. (p. 45)

As Hunter draws this section to a close, he makes a strong case…the current ability of Christians to influence culture is “doubtful” (p. 92).

What do you think?  Is Hunter on to something?  Is the work of transforming culture about the individual, or is it about something larger?  Is it about both?  What role does God play in the transformation, or progression, of culture?

More to come on this topic next week.

What is my intent for this blog?

I’m not writing merely to spew out random thoughts.  My intention is to be very focused and purposeful.  I’m writing with one overriding goal in mind: 

To sound the alarm among God’s people for the need to direct our resources to the greatest mission opportunity in our time, the CAMPUS tribes.

And what is this thing called “Mission”, of which so many Christians speak?

Jesus clearly commanded his followers to “Go and make disciples of all nations…” (Matthew 28). That’s our job as Christians, Christ-followers.  That’s The Mission…to make followers of Jesus.

Now, understanding The Mission, why do I suggest that our university campuses are in critical need of our attention?  Afterall, isn’t “mission” about going to some foreign nation to tell people about Jesus?

No, not at all.  It is much more than that.

Consider the following:

• Young adults between the ages of 18 and 25 are America’s MOST UNREACHED demographic (Barna Research)! The national average of Christians on university campuses is less than 5% (campusrenewal.org from a 1997 study).  Mission-minded folks will tell you that any demographic where less than 10% are Christian is considered “unreached.”
• Young adults, between the ages of 18 and 25, are at a time in life when they can devote massive amounts of time and energy to advancing the Kingdom.  The church needs the efforts of this untapped demographic.

These two items might be reason enough to cause the Church to rethink her current mission strategies, but let me continue on.

• Approximately 78% of all Christians make a decision to follow Christ before the age of 21.  Campus ministers (or shall we call them “campus missionaries”) are in position to serve students who are at a critical stage of life.
• Ultimately, failure to reach the college campus today will have monumental consequences on the Church, and society as a whole, tomorrow.  Bill Bright (founder of Campus Crusade for Christ) was correct when he said, “Win the campus today, and change the world tomorrow.”
• THE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS IS THE GREATEST MISSION FIELD IN OUR WORLD TODAY…more than half of the world’s population today is under the age of 25!  These people are where?  On the university campus! (UN Population Reference Bureau)
• Did you know that, throughout modern history, nearly every single great missionary movement was started through revival on the university campus?  It’s true!  Win the campus and we unleash a massive work force for the Kingdom.

Most U.S. churches have a link to a “cross-cultural missionary” (generally defined as someone serving among a people group from a differing culture than the church’s own culture).  These types of ministries are often perceived to be a bit more “glamorous” (simply because the target people are so different from us) than the local food pantry, or the local campus ministry, so we feel like these cross-cultural ministries are more worthy of our resources.  But let’s be real…God neither shows favoritism nor sees greater glamor from one mission field to the next. What is local to us is cross-cultural to someone else.

Now I’m not suggesting that the Church ignore cross-cultural fields.  We’re called to go “to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8).  But I am suggesting we discontinue our ungodly favoritism and treat campus ministry as a part of the “mission field.”  The local church is often set in the midst of a monumental mission field…the university campus.  Why not turn our sights to these fields which are ripe for harvest?

Finally, I do not intend to suggest a new course of action without clearly outlining the how to accomplish it.  Therefore, I’ll keep two primary purposes in mind:  1) to bring to the forefront of discussions the importance of campus ministry, and 2) to recommend the most effective method the church can utilize to reach the university campus for Christ.

OK…good reminders for me.

“It is this lack of missiological understanding and application that is responsible for the existence of a Western church that is on the verge of death!”

[Sidenote: I hope that I don't need to convince you that the Western church is indeed "critical" and in need of intensive care.  If you would like to read more on this topic, check out Barna's book, Revolution.  It's an easy, eye-opening read on the state of the Western church.]

Why do I believe a lack of good missiology has led to the weakening of the church in the West?  It really comes down to confusion between faith and religion.  The Western church has too often focused on spreading a religion, not transferring a faith.

Faith and religion are not the same.  Faith is a firm belief in something, leading to action.  Religion is the system we use to express our faith.  In the words of best selling author, Seth Godin, “If religion comprises rules you follow, faith is demonstrated by the actions you take” (Tribes, p. 83).

Religion is the system we use to express our faith.

Missiologists focus on developing a person’s faith, not on teaching the person the performance of a religious system.  The church, especially the Western church, has expended too much of her energy on the religious activity.

In anthropological terms, missiologists talk about forms and meanings.  Forms are what we use to express our deeper longings.  We attach meaning to various forms.

In church, we often focus on teaching the performance of proper forms.  Stand now.  Be quiet now.  Bow your head now.  Kneel now.  Smile now.

The better approach?  Communicate meaning, at the heart level, and allow the hearer to practice their faith using relevant forms.

I hear from college students all the time that they are so discouraged by the people in the church they attend.  The student sees people practicing religion, but they don’t often see faith being lived out.  There’s a disconnect.

Why is it that students are not encountering genuine faith at church?  The answer is simple: Church members are, in large part, practicing religious ritual, not exercising a faith.

This is why I love working with college students.  They’re not at all satisfied with the way things are in the Western church, and they believe they can make the necessary changes.  They long to see Christian faith at work!

I believe the future is bright for the Church.  I have faith in God that He will continue to use His people to transform the world.

What do you believe?

Last week when I was in Turkana (northern Kenya), I attended church in a rural village.  Traditionally, such a gathering of people, indeed every important gathering of people, would be convened under a tree.  Any Westerner attending one of these church services quickly realizes there are some major differences in worldview present!  However, during this most recent trip to Turkana, I found myself inside a building for Sunday morning services in the village.  Sure, it still had a different feel to it (mud walls, tin roof, different language, different music, etc.), but the feel was at least a bit more familiar to my Western mind.

Traditional Turkana Church, Under a Tree

I thought, with some sadness, “Will this non-Duck (non-Western church) keep looking more and more like a Duck (Western church)?  But it is NOT a Duck!”

As the Turkana church begins to “look” more and more Western, we need to be careful to continue to contextualize the gospel message.  In other words, just because the church in Turkana begins to look more and more like a church in the West, the people living within the Turkana context have a very different worldview.  The message of Jesus is meant to reach people at a deep level, their heart level, and this cannot happen if the hearer’s worldview is not taken into consideration as ministry “programs” are developed.

The danger in doing ministry within a situation that “looks” familiar to us is that we will often fail to do the research, up front, to understand how our hearers think, feel, and perceive the world. In a more familiar context, it is much easier for us to simply assume we already know the worldview of our audience.  We assume we already know their thoughts, feelings, and needs.

Good ministry will always do the hard work of contextual research before implementing various forms of ministry.

So the question becomes, “This looks like a Duck, but is it really a Duck?”

This is the major failing of the Western church today.  Her leaders too often fail to ask this vital question.

We (speaking for those of us in the ministry profession) are really good at doing the “copy” and “paste” thing when it comes to ministry.  We see something working well over-there, and over-there looks like me over-here, so it must be true that that-thing will be successful over-here as well as over-there.  In reality, it is highly likely what is working over-there is the result of a lot of good contextualization, and research.  Someone has done the necessary missiological work of trying to understand their ministry context, and it is paying off!

Campus Ministry?  Well, students look like “normal” people to me, so it must be OK to treat them like normal people.  Wrong!  Students are quite different than their older counterparts.  They have a different outlook on life.  They have different needs.  Their hopes and dreams are far different from the generation which precedes them.  They’re NOT a Duck.

Many ministers have not figured out, even after years and years of doing ministry, that they are actually missionaries.  And as missionaries, they also need to be missiologists…they need to understand that doing culture and language study is a part of every ministry gig…not just a part of the “foreign missions” gig.  It is this lack of missiological understanding and application that is responsible for the existence of a Western church that is on the verge of death!

So, what does the Western church need?  No, not a doctor, but a missiologist…and a good one!

I have MUCH more to say on this topic, so I’ll take more time to discuss this over the next couple of weeks.  I’d love to hear your thoughts, feelings.